Reinforced concrete sleepers economical reinforcement
https://doi.org/10.52170/1815-9265_2022_61_67
Abstract
The article is devoted to the optimization of the reinforcing string package of a reinforced concrete sleeper. Standard sleepers of the Sh1 and ShS types of small height in the middle section are characterized by an uneven distribution of sole pressure on the ballast. The purpose of this study was to improve reinforced concrete sleepers and determine their parameters to ensure better stress distribution in the sleeper during its operation under trains, in particular, to increase the “effective” area of the sleeper foot.
Several variants of reinforced concrete sleepers were modeled in software systems for calculation by finite element methods. The design cases were determined, the most unfavorable for the bending of the sleeper – the support of the sole of the sleeper on the weakly compacted crushed stone ballast and the bending of the sleeper on the test factory stand when checking it for crack resistance.
An analysis of calculation results with a change in the tension force of the wires showed that crack resistance is provided with a total tension of 38 strings with a force of 300 to 310 kN for a modified sleeper reinforced with 38 strings with a diameter of 3 mm. As a result of testing reinforced concrete sleepers from an experimental batch with a string package height of 90 mm and a number of strings equal to 40 pieces, it was shown that the concrete is destroyed, and the reinforcement is not torn. Therefore, this modification allows more efficient use of reinforcing wire. In addition, it provides a better distribution of sleeper pressure on the ballast.
For the production of reinforced concrete sleepers, it was proposed to increase the height of the string package to 105 mm with a decrease in the number of strings of high-strength wire to 40 pcs. This will reduce the maximum pressure of the sleeper on the ballast to 8 % and reduce the rate of accumulation of residual deformations of the ballast under the modified sleeper by 25 % in comparison with a typical sleeper Sh1 with a string package of 44 strings 75 mm high.
The results of an experimental verification of the strength and crack resistance of reinforced concrete sleepers with 38–40 reinforcing strings at the sleeper plant LLP “Magnetik” showed that with an increase in the height of the string package to 90–105 mm, the required crack resistance of reinforced concrete sleepers is provided.
About the Authors
S. A. KosenkoRussian Federation
Sergey A. Kosenko, Professor of the Track and Track Facilities Department, Doctor of Engineering
Novosibirsk
D. V. Velichko
Russian Federation
Dmtriy V. Velichko, Associate Professor of the Track and Track Facilities Department, Candidate of Engineering
Novosibirsk
S. V. Bogdanovich
Russian Federation
Svetlana V. Bogdanovich, Associate Professor of the Operational Operations Management Department, Candidate of Engineering
Novosibirsk
S. S. Khasenov
Kazakhstan
Serik S. Khasenov, Professor of the Magistral Engineering Department, Doctor of Engineering
Almaty
I. K. Sokolovskiy
Russian Federation
Ivan K. Sokolovskiy, Post-graduate Student of the Track and Track Facilities Department
Novosibirsk
References
1. Kosenko S. A., Yudin O. G. Intermediate rail fasteners with template and level adjustment. Polytransport systems: materials of the X Intern. sci.-tech. conf. (Novosibirsk, November 15–16, 2018). Novosibirsk: Publishing House of Siberian Transport University; 2019. Р. 100–104. (In Russ.).
2. Sevostyanov A. A., Velichko D. V., Roshka V. V. Evaluation of the operational performance of the railway track depending on the design of intermediate rail fastenings The Siberian Transport University Bulletin. 2019;(50):23–30. (In Russ.).
3. Kosenko S. A. [et al.]. Analysis of promising intermediate rail fastenings: research report. Novosibirsk: Publishing House of Siberian Transport University; 2020. 71 p. (In Russ.).
4. Karpuschenko N. I., Pimenov I. Ya., Otmakhov V. A. [et al.]. Fastenings KN-65 and GS-65. Way and track facilities. 2003;(9):30–33. (In Russ.).
5. Blazhko L. S., Vasiliev S. G., Romanov A. V. Risk assessment in the system of technical infrastructure resolution. Transport of the Russian Federation. 2019;(80):4–7. (In Russ.). 6. Kolos A. F., Kozlov I. S. Modern track structures for the construction of high-speed and high-speed railway lines. Bulletin of scientific research results. 2013;(28):176–181. (In Russ.).
6. Kosenko S., Akimov S., Surovin P. Technology of rail replacement at end stresses. MATEC: Web of Conferences. 2018;216:1–8.
7. Karpuschenko N. I. Reliability of connections of rails with the base. M.: Transport; 1986. 150 p. (In Russ.).
8. Kosenko S. A., Zolotukhin V. I. Improvement of the design of reinforced concrete sleepers. Bulletin of the Engineering Academy of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2007;(30):76–78. (In Russ.).
9. Kosenko S. A., Kotova I. A., Nikitin I. V., Sokolovsky I. K. Railway track. Calculations and design: : textbook method. allowance: educational electronic edition. Novosibirsk: Publishing House of Siberian Transport University; 2021. 115 p. http://doi.org/10.12731/ofernio.2021.24935.2. (In Russ.).
10. Kosenko S. A., Akimov S. S. Device and repair of the railway track: textbook.-method. allowance: textbook. electron. edition. Novosibirsk: Publishing House of Siberian Transport University, 2021. 128 p. http://doi.org/10.12731/ofernio.2021.24882.2. (In Russ.).
11. Kosenko S. A., Isaenko E. P. Modeling and calculations of the stress-strain state of railway track structures by the finite element method: monograph. Novosibirsk: Publishing House of Siberian Transport University; 2017. 144 p. (In Russ.).
12. Zakharov V. B., Poletaev V. I., Romanov A. V., Chernyaev E. V. Breakdown of connections and intersections of railway tracks: textbook. allowance. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of Petersburg State Transport University; 2013. 46 p. (In Russ.).
13. Blazhko L. S., Dmokhovsky M. E., Zakharov V. B. Method for extending the service life of railroad switches. Bulletin of the Institute of Problems of Natural Monopolies. Railway technology. 2017;(38):54–58. (In Russ.).
14. Fedorov I. V., Vorobyov A. A., Samarkina I. K., Konogray O. A., Bunkova T. G. Study of the stress state in the contact “wheel-rail” in the presence of a chip. Proceedings of Petersburg State Transport University. 2019;(4):78–86. (In Russ.).
15. Orlova A. M., Vorobyov A. A., Saidova A. V., Kerentsev D. E. Determination of the parameters of wheel-rail contact for various operating conditions of a gondola car. Proceedings of Petersburg State Transport University. 2015;(2):74–84. (In Russ.).
16. Vorobyov A. A. Mathematical modeling of wheel-rail contact parameters for different operating conditions of railcars. Bulletin of the Institute for Problems of Natural Monopolies: Railway Engineering. 2016;(33):34–41. (In Russ.).
17. Romanov A. V., Kolos A. F., Kiselev A. A., Romanov S. V. Causes of violation of the smooth running of trains. Way and track facilities. 2020;(7):29–31. (In Russ.).
18. Vorobyov V. S., Bryzgalova R. M., Repina I. B. Human factor in the system of failures of technical means of railway transport. Science and Transport. 2012;(3):42–46. (In Russ.).
19. Sevostyanov A. A., Velichko D. V. The main causes of rail failures during operation. Transport of the Urals. 2017;(53):51–54. (In Russ.).
20. Rules for the appointment of railway track repairs: approved. Decree of Russian Railways No. 2888 r dated December 17, 2021. M.: Russian Railways JSC; 2021. 273 p. (In Russ.).
21. Rules for the technical operation of the railways of the Russian Federation: approved. by order of the Ministry of Transport of the Russian Federation of December 21, 2010: as amended. Order of the Ministry of Transport of the Russian Federation No. 54 dated December 25, 2018. M.; 2018. 475 p. (In Russ.).
22. Vinogradov V. V., Nikonov A. M., Yakovleva T. G. Calculations and design of the railway track: textbook allowance. M.: Route; 2003. 485 p. ISBN 5-89035-112-5. (In Russ.).
23. Ashpiz E. S., Gasanov A. I., Gluzberg B. E. [et. al.]; Ashpiz E. S., ed. Railway track: textbook. M.: Educational methodical education center on the railway transp.; 2013. 544 p. ISBN 978-5-89035-689-5. (In Russ.).
24. Lysyuk V. S., Kamensky V. B., Bashkatova L. V. Railway track reliability. M.: Transport; 2001. 286 p. (In Russ.).
25. Blazhko L. S., Chuyan S. N., Zakharov V. B., Chernyaev E. V. Analysis of ways to increase the bearing capacity of soils of the main subgrade area. Proceedings of Petersburg State Transport University. 2016;13(48):328–336. (In Russ.).
26. Lanis A. L., Ovchinnikov S. A. Strengthening subgrade soils with reinforcing structures. Modern problems of design, construction and operation of the railway track: Proceedings of the IX International Conference. M.: Publishing House of the Moscow State Transport University; 2014. P. 153–156. (In Russ.).
27. Akimov S. S., Kosenko S. A. Recycling as an alternative way to increase the strength of the sub-ballast base of a railway track. Science, education, personnel: materials of the nat. conf. within the framework of the IX Intern. Sib. transp. Forum (Novosibirsk, May 22–25, 2019). Novosibirsk: Publishing House of Siberian Transport University; 2019. Р. 204–212. (In Russ.).
28. Kosenko S. A., Kosenko I. A., Akimov S. S. A feasibility study for the installation of protective sub-ballast layers of soil concrete during heavy train traffic. Bulletin of the Tomsk University of Architecture and Civil Engineering. 2021;23(1):161–174. (In Russ.).
29. Kvashnin M. Ya., Kosenko S. A., Bondar I. S. Vibrodiagnostics of the railway bridge approach embankment. The Siberian Transport University Bulletin. 2017;(41):34–39. (In Russ.).
30. Lanis A. L., Razuvaev D. A. Strengthening subgrade soils on approaches to bridges and overpasses. Bulletin of the Rostov State Transport University. 2016;(63):97–104. (In Russ.).
31. Urazbekov A. K., Kosenko S. A. Technical diagnostics and non-destructive testing of railway rails: textbook. allowance. Almaty: Kazakh Academy of Transport and Communications. M. T. Tynyshpaeva; 2008. 193 p. ISBN 9965-421-85-4. (In Russ.).
32. Kosenko S. A., Akimov S. S., Bogdanovich S. V., Sokolovsky I. K. Estimation of the cost of the life cycle of the upper structure of the track when extending the overhaul period. The Siberian Transport University Bulletin. 2021;(56):71–78. (In Russ.).
33. Pokrovskaya O. D., Korovyakovsky E. K. Terminalistics – organization and management in transport hubs. Proceedings of the Petersburg State Transport University. 2016;13(49):509–520. (In Russ.).
34. Pokrovskaya O. D. Determination of the parameters of the terminal network of the region (on the example of the Kemerovo region). Transport of the Urals. 2012;(32):93–97. (In Russ.).
35. Pokrovskaya O. D., Samuilov V. M. International logistics of the Trans-Siberian Railway: using the transit potential of Russia. Innovative transport. 2016;(21):3–7. (In Russ.).
36. Titova T. S., Pokrovskaya O. D. Interdisciplinary position of the theory of terminalistics. Proceedings of the Petersburg State Transport University. 2018;15(2):248–260. (In Russ.).
37. Pserovskaya E. D., Kim A. S., Kuzmina O. A. Improving the efficiency of services for accelerated delivery of goods in the direction of the Far East. Transport of the Urals. 2019;(61):32–37. (In Russ.).
38. Turanov Kh. T., Pserovskaya E. D. Calculation of the longitudinal shift of a cylindrical load and effort in the fastening elements with a variation in the number of fasteners. Transport of the Urals. 2013;(38):16–23. (In Russ.).
39. GOST 33330–2015. Reinforced concrete sleepers for 1520 mm gauge railways. General technical conditions. M.: Standartinform; 2016. 31 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Kosenko S.A., Velichko D.V., Bogdanovich S.V., Khasenov S.S., Sokolovskiy I.K. Reinforced concrete sleepers economical reinforcement. Bulletin of Siberian State University of Transport. 2022;(2):67-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52170/1815-9265_2022_61_67