Controlled parameters of monitoring systems for railway bridge superstructures with trusses
https://doi.org/10.52170/1815-9265_2024_68_109
Abstract
The bridge superstructures are crucial, expensive components of the transportation system, significantly influencing safety and operational continuity. Modern regulations mandate monitoring for large and exceptional bridges. Monitoring systems are just beginning to be actively implemented, and the existing method for evaluating technical condition based on monitoring results needs refinement. This article examines the monitored parameters of railway bridge superstructures with through trusses based on theoretical and experimental analysis of the stressed-deformed state of the bridge superstructure over the Ob River in Novosibirsk. The study aims to improve the method for evaluating the technical condition of lattice superstructures based on automated monitoring results. New monitored parameters were proposed to more accurately track the onset and development of damage in the superstructure. The analysis of data from strain sensors installed on the Komsomolsky Bridge over the Ob River in Novosibirsk demonstrated the advantages of using invariant parameters and stresses in elements under identical loads for assessing bridge conditions. The study confirms the possibility of using these parameters to enhance the accuracy of damage detection by the monitoring system, thereby increasing railway network safety. This work contributes to the development of methods for assessing the condition of railway superstructures based on monitoring results. The findings are supported by statistical data analysis and can serve as a basis for improving monitoring systems, enhancing their accuracy and reliability in predicting the technical condition of metal superstructures.
About the Author
E. O. IvanovRussian Federation
Evgeniy O. Ivanov – Engineer, Siberian Research Institute of Bridges
Novosibirsk
References
1. Zhunev K. O., Murovanny Yu. N., Yashnov A. N. Fatigue life research of welded joints in railway spanning structures. Russian Journal of Transport Engineering. 2020;(2). (In Russ.). URL: https://t-s.today/PDF/06SATS220.pdf.
2. Bokarev S. A., Zhunev K. O. Features and prospects of assessing the residual life of welded metal span structures of railway bridges. Bulletin of the Siberian Transport University. 2017;(40):30–35. (In Russ.).
3. SP 274.1325800.2016. Bridges. Monitoring of the technical condition. Approved by the order of the Ministry of Construction and Housing and Communal Services of the Russian Federation from 16 December 2016 № 967/pr. Introduced on 17.06.2017. Moscow: Standartinform; 2017. 52 p. (In Russ.).
4. GOST 32019-2012. Monitoring of the technical condition of unique buildings and structures. Rules for the design and installation of stationary systems (stations) of monitoring. Adopted by the Interstate Scientific and Technical Commission for Standardization, Technical Norming and Conformity Assessment in Construction (Protocol of 18 December 2012 № 41). Introduced on 01.01.2014. Moscow: Standartinform; 2014. 35 p. (In Russ.).
5. Vasiliev A. I., Khazanov M. D. Practice of monitoring the stress-strain state of large and extra-class bridges and high-rise structures. Road World. 2021;(140):82–83. (In Russ.).
6. Yashnov A. N., Snezhkov I. I. Development of diagnostic and monitoring systems for bridges. The Siberian Transport University Bulletin. 2020;(3):6–13. (In Russ.).
7. Yashnov A. N. Comprehensive system for monitoring the technical condition of bridges. New technologies in bridge construction 2022: Proceedings of the Scientific-Practical Conference. Edited by V. N. Smirnov, S. V. Chizhov, D. A. Shestovitsky. Saint Petersburg; 2022. P. 114–119. (In Russ.).
8. Vasiliev A. I. Monitoring of the technical condition of bridge structures. Textbook. Moscow: Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University; 2021. 120 p. (In Russ.).
9. Bely A. A., Belov A. A., Yashchenko A. I., Antonyuk A. A. Integral monitoring of the Alexander Nevsky Bridge. Travel Navigator. 2020;(71):38–45. (In Russ.).
10. Safronova M. A., Chaplin I. V. Operational experience of monitoring girder structures. Fundamental and Applied Issues of Transport. 2023;(9):85–95. (In Russ.).
11. Ivanov E. O. Selection of control elements of the span structure for forming a monitoring system. Idea, Practice, Perspectives. Proceedings of the National (all-Russian) Scientific-Technological Conference. Novosibirsk: Publishing house of Novosibirsk State Technical University. 2019. P. 14–17. (In Russ.).
12. Krutikov O. V., Gershuni I. Sh., Ryzhov D. I. Evaluation of the forms of natural vibrations of bridge spans during monitoring. Transport Structures. 2022;9(2)1–23. (In Russ.). 10.15862/01SATS222. URL: https://t-s.today/PDF/01SATS222.pdf.
13. Torres B., Poveda P., Ivorra S., Estevan L. Long-term static and dynamic monitoring to failure scenarios assessment in steel truss railway bridges: A case study. Engineering Failure Analysis. 2023. Vol. 152. Р. 107435.
14. Yashnov A. N., Kuzmenkov P. Yu., Ivanov E. O. Development of bridge technical condition monitoring. Track and Track Facility. 2021;(7):14–18. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Ivanov E.O. Controlled parameters of monitoring systems for railway bridge superstructures with trusses. Bulletin of Siberian State University of Transport. 2024;(1):109-116. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52170/1815-9265_2024_68_109